Why coding agents need verification
Coding agents can produce large diffs quickly, but speed creates a new review problem: the agent can sound confident even when the work only partially matches the task.
Verification adds a separate layer that compares the original request, changed files, tests, and known risk signals before the team treats the change as complete.
FeelGoot is built for teams that want agent productivity without converting every reviewer into a manual forensic investigator.
What FeelGoot checks
Intent alignment: whether the code change maps to the stated task, acceptance criteria, constraints, and non-goals.
Evidence quality: whether tests exercise real behavior or merely prove that generated code can pass shallow checks.
Shortcut risk: stubs, mocks, skipped tests, hardcoded success paths, overly narrow assertions, and unexplained risky files.
Completion status: whether the result should be allowed, blocked, or sent back for more evidence.
Where it sits in the workflow
FeelGoot is designed to run around coding agents, pull requests, CI pipelines, and review queues. The agent proposes code; FeelGoot produces a structured receipt; humans review the evidence instead of trusting the narration.
This makes it useful for AI-native engineering teams, platform teams building internal agent systems, and high-assurance software teams that need traceable acceptance decisions.